High
High: fake AI add-ons sent real users' chatbot conversations to attackers, the source reports about 900,000 users compromised, and it applies to organizations whose staff use browser add-ons and AI chat. How we rate severity
Malicious AI browser extensions: fake AI sidebars copied users' chatbot conversations
Researchers found two fake AI sidebar extensions sending users' chatbot conversations and browsing data to attackers. One carried a store Featured badge.
What happened
On December 30, 2025, OX Security reported two malicious AI browser extensions in the Chrome Web Store. According to OX, both posed as a legitimate AI sidebar extension that lets users chat with popular AI models from any web page, and both copied the legitimate tool’s interface so they appeared to work normally.
OX says the extensions asked users for consent to collect “anonymous, non-identifiable analytics data,” but instead captured full ChatGPT and DeepSeek conversations, including prompts and responses, along with the URLs of all open Chrome tabs. It says the data was stored locally and sent to a remote command-and-control server every 30 minutes. OX describes the reach as “over 900,000 Chrome extension downloads,” listing one extension at more than 600,000 users and the other at more than 300,000. It says the larger one carried Google’s “Featured” badge.
OX says it reported both extensions to Google on December 29, 2025. As of December 30, it says, Google had responded that the issue was in review, and both extensions were still available, with the first still carrying its “Featured” badge. OX notes that the stolen conversations could include source code, business plans, personal information, and confidential communications, and that tab URLs can include session tokens and internal corporate addresses.
Why it matters to leaders (our analysis)
Whatever employees type into an AI chat in the browser can be read by any extension with broad page access. In this case the extensions looked like useful AI tools, worked as advertised, and one had a store badge that signals quality, not security. The data at risk is whatever staff chose to share with an AI assistant, which can be a lot.
The controls are mostly existing browser management: allow-listing, permission review, and monitoring. Giving staff an approved AI tool also reduces the pull toward consumer add-ons.
What to tell your board
Fake AI browser add-ons have copied users' chatbot conversations, so we allow only approved extensions on company browsers and offer approved AI tools with clear data rules.
What your board will ask
- Can employees install any browser extension on the browsers they use for work?
- What do staff paste into AI chat tools, and would we know if a browser extension was copying it?
- Do we offer an approved AI assistant, so staff have less reason to use consumer tools and add-ons in the browser?
Controls that help
- Allow-list browser extensions on managed browsers, and review extensions that request permission to read all website content. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems
- Don't treat a store rating or badge as a security review. Check extension publishers and permissions before approval. NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC
- Provide approved AI tools with logging and data controls, and set clear rules on what data may go into AI chats. NIST AI RMF — GOVERN
- Monitor managed browsers for newly installed extensions and for outbound traffic to unfamiliar domains. NIST CSF 2.0 — DE.CM
- Search managed browsers for the two extension IDs OX published (fnmihdojmnkclgjpcoonokmkhjpjechg and inhcgfpbfdjbjogdfjbclgolkmhnooop) and remove them. Match on ID, since extension names can change. NIST CSF 2.0 — DE.CM
Download one-slide summary
Sources
Change log
- Oct 17, 2026. First published.
Coming soon
The weekly AI security briefing
The five AI risks security leaders should know, with the questions your board will ask. Signups open soon.
Signups open soon. We'll never share your email. See our Privacy Policy. Privacy Policy